Hittar inte länken men har PDFen liggandes på den här analysen, alla märken är inte med men valde ut de som jag anser vara vanliga i svenska butiker och som fanns med i studien.
Jag själv kör Tyngres protein, tycker det är goda och fräscha smaker, lättlösligt i både fet-, lättmjölk samt vatten (beroende på kalorimål). I övrigt kan jag ge tips till dig som kan vara en nybörjare.
- Kreatin (Creatine monohydrate), det mest studerade kosttillskottet, något varje person som går till gymmet bör ta.
- BCAA, egentligen ej nödvändigt. Om inte alla essentiella (EAA) aminosyror inte finns i din kost så får du i dig tillräckligt genom att ta en skopa whey innan gymmet.
- PWO, inget jag personligen tar. Vissa anser att det ger effekt (om än placebo) och andra kör utan. Är en ganska delad skara mellan att använda BCAA och PWO. Vissa anser det som prestationshöjande andra som smaksatt vatten.
- Jeff Nippard, otroligt duktig träningsprofil som analyserar studier och bryter ned dom på ett pedagogiskt sätt. Här har du en första video du kan kolla på. Nästintill allt på hans kanal är värt att se och lyssna på.
TL;DR Undvik svenskt kosttillskott
Candilab Protein Powder Industry Analysis
How well do brands and manufacturers fit their label claim? Do they underdose on protein, spike the nitrogen content with single amino acids? Can consumers trust them?
The subsequent analysis of the content of these supplement, showed that although most of the products tested complie with their label claims, there were several examples of unclear labelling and deviations from label claims, summarized below.
1.
●Across the protein brands, the products contained approximately 3.5% less protein than the label claim. At least one product, Svenskt Kosttilskott Core Whey, was short by more than the tolerance of 8 grams of protein/100 grams. Another product, Hardline Whey 3matrix had measured protein and/or creatine concentration that were inconsistent with the labeled amounts.
2.
●Provided label amino acid profiles were found to vary significantly between products and to deviate significantly from measured amino acid profiles. This leads to a worse calculated protein quality, than that derived from measured amino acid profiles
3.
●The measured amino acid profiles generally matched well with labelled additions of specific amino acids, with the exception of BioTechUSA ISo Whey Zero, that has a profile inconsistent with the label claim of added branch chain amino acids.
4.
●We found no evidence of hidden nitrogen spiking, but both the Svenskt Kosttilskott and Self Omninutrition products had large amounts of protein replaced by glycine. While this was stated in the amino acid profile for the Self Omninutrition (not in the other product), it still results in a product of inferior quality.
1. Investigate if protein content
label claims are met (per 100g)
2. Provide precise and reliable
third party data for amino acid
content.
3. Monitor major protein supplement
brands for signs of amino
acid or nitrogen spiking
See the test results on
the following pages.
Optimum Nutrition
Gold Standard Whey 100
Protein claim difference
-2,1 grams (pr. 100)
Gold Standard Whey from Optimum Nutrition contained 76.4 grams of protein (per 100 grams), which was 2.1 grams less than the label claim of 78.5. This is inside the accepted tolerance of +/- 8 grams (for high protein products) in the EU.
The amino acid profile is consistent with the label claim of whey protein with no added amino acids.
Mutant Core Series Whey
Protein claim difference
-7,6 grams (pr. 100)
Mutant Whey contained 52.4 grams of protein (per 100 grams), which was 7.6 grams less than the label claim of 60. This is inside the accepted tolerance of +/- 8 grams (for high protein products) in the EU.
The amino acid profile is consistent with the label claim of whey and milk proteins. It has one of the highest leucine contents across the tested products
Scitec Nutrition 100% Whey Protein
Protein claim difference
-3,2 grams (pr. 100)
100% Whey Professional from Scitec contained 69.8 grams of protein (per 100 grams), which was 3.2 grams less than the label claim of 73. This is inside the accepted tolerance of +/- 8 grams (for high protein products) in the EU.
The amino acid profile is consistent with the label claim of whey with added leucine and glutamine.
Myprotein Impact Whey Protein™
Protein claim difference
-1,5 grams (pr. 100)
Impact Whey Protein from Myprotein contained 69.5 grams of protein (per 100 grams), which was 1.5 grams less than the label claim of 71. This is inside the accepted tolerance of +/- 8 grams (for high protein products) in the EU.
The amino acid profile is consistent with the label claim of whey protein with no added amino acids.
Muscletech Premium 100% Whey Protein Plus
Protein claim difference
+12,2 grams (pr. 100)
Premium Whey from Muscletech contained 62.2 grams of protein (per 100 grams), which was 12.2 grams more than the label claim of 50. This is outside the accepted tolerance of +/- 8 grams (for high protein products) in the EU.
However, the measured protein content is based on nitrogen measurement that also includes nitrogen from creatine, of which there is a label claim of 6.25 g/100 g. As each g of creatine reads as 2 g of protein, this means that the label claim of protein is probably accurate. The amino acid profile is consistent with the label claim of whey protein with no added amino acids.
BioTech USA Iso Whey Zero
Protein claim difference
-7,5 grams (pr. 100)
Iso Whey ZERO from BioTechUSA contained 76.5 grams of protein (per 100 grams), which was 7.5 grams less than the label claim of 84. This is inside the accepted tolerance of +/- 8 grams (for high protein products) in the EU.
The amino acid profile is consistent with the labelled content of whey and milk proteins with added glutamine. However, the amino acid profile is not consistent with the label claim of added BCAAs.
Bulk Powders Whey
Protein claim difference
-2,9 grams (pr. 100)
Pure Whey protein from Bulkpwders contained 72.1 grams of protein (per 100 grams), which was 2.9 grams less than the label claim of 75. This is inside the accepted tolerance of +/- 8 grams (for high protein products) in the EU.
The amino acid profile is consistent with the label claim of whey protein with no added amino acids.
Proteinfabrikken 100% Whey Protein
Protein claim difference
-0,4 grams (pr. 100)
100% Whey from Proteinfabrikken contained 71.6 grams of protein (per 100 grams), which was 0.4 grams less than the label claim of 72. This is inside the accepted tolerance of +/- 8 grams (for high protein products) in the EU.
The amino acid profile is consistent with the label claim of whey protein with no added amino acids.
Svensktkosttilskott Core Whey Protein OBS OBS OBS
Protein claim difference
-12,2 grams (pr. 100)
Core Whey from Svenskt Kosttilskott contained 62.8 grams of protein (per 100 grams), which was 12.2 grams less than the label claim of 75. This is outside the accepted tolerance of +/- 8 grams (for high protein products) in the EU.
The amino acid profile is consistent with the label claim of whey with, but with rather large amounts of added glycine, alanine and lysine. In fact, more than 15% of the product seem to consist of these amino acids, with 11-13 grams of added glycine alone per 100 g.
Star Nutrition Whey-80
Protein claim difference
+2,1 grams (pr. 100)
Whey 80 from Star Nutrition contained 77.1 grams of protein (per 100 grams), which was 2.1 grams more than the label claim of 75. This is inside the accepted tolerance of +/- 8 grams (for high protein products) in the EU.
The amino acid profile is consistent with the label claim of whey protein with no added amino acids.
