Skrivet av Imaculent:
What?
Är väl inte bugg. Är väl som det ska vara.
Skrivet av Andyah:
hmm den som kör med 60fov har tunnelseende..visst sålänge fienden är raktframför så ser du den bra..men den med 120fov hinner se vad som händer brevid dig..så man får väl försöka hitta nått mellanläge som passar sig o sin skärm/skärmar
Skrivet av Lapo:
Exakt förstår inte grejen riktigt... Och självklart blir det sjuka skillnader när du dubblar foven.
Skrivet av DevilRape:
Nu förstår jag inte riktigt.. Det ska väl vara så där? Det är ju det som FOV är, att zooma in och ut på det sättet.
Ni som inte förstår problematiken här, jag rekommenderar att ni läser ordentligt i denna tråd där de går in på det mer djupgående: http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf4/en/forum/threadview/2955...
Tex denna text beskriver det hela rätt bra:
So, everyone saying this should not be changed has pretty much brought up those arguments:
"Don't whine, high FOV players would be at an advanatge otherwise."
- wrong, you do not have a lot more situational awareness when playing on a high FOV. You DO have more stuff on your screen but at the same time it is much smaller and harder to indentify.
- Also, even though players have used high FOVs to gain advantages in games like Quake and UT with bright colored enemies and no textures on the rest of the map (I was one of them), a high FOV in a slow paced game on giant maps does NOT even compare to those in any way.
"If you don't like it just adapt, lower your FOV and have the best of both worlds"
- Oh I would love to, I don't care about fitting as much of the map on my screen as I can, the problem is I, and many many other PC players, can't play for very long with a FOV lower than 90/100, some even higher than that. We do NOT have the choice to do so. It is simply discriminating against people who get motionsickness easily and/or have a setup where they sit rather close to their monitor. I like my monitor and I would prefer not to puke all over it.
"But, players with a low FOV don't gain an advantage like that!"
- Oh yes they do. It's pretty easy, Joe plays on 60 FOV and uses a RDS. Mike also uses a RDS, but due to easily getting motion sick he has to play on 95 FOV. They both see each other on the battlefield, both are in cover and ADS at the same time. Both Joe and Mike have to compensate for the same amount of recoil with the exact same effort because your actual sight moves the same on both screens. But Joe will easily win this firefight, because he has much more leeway to adjust his sight, he doesn't have to go pixelhunting with his bouncing sight because the enemy is simply bigger on his RDS than on Mike's. Mike is now dead, I hope you realize what you've done...
"Okay, but you can just choose to use a magnifier, a scope with more zoom!"
- Oh no, you can't. I mean you can, but first of all you would have to give up an attachment slot for the magnifier, then there is the problem thatt ALL other sights besides RDS block a lot more of your view and make recoil harder to control. And, the biggest problem here, playing at a high FOV will just screw up ALL sights for you in relation to RDS, the most common sight. RDS is supposed to be 1x, no zoom. But the magnifer(due to having a fixed FOV) will suddenly zoom in 3x maybe even 4x in relation to the RDS, which you are used to. If we go to 3.4x or 4x sights it just gets worse, so no, there is no alternative.
If anyone actually read this, I hope you see now that no one is trying to get an advantage over you, nobody wants to see the whole map on his little screen, realize you are standing behind him and then snipe you with their pistol from accross the map. We just want to enjoy the game, have the same experience as you do and have a fair fight.
And to anyone who plays on a high FOV and enjoys it the way it is right now, let's just make it an option, or get a second FOV slider etc. I also don't want you to lose the experience you like at the moment.
That's it, please consider it again.
